MedValidate — Validate Today · Impact Tomorrowv3 · regulatory · literature · patents · reports

Before you build a medical device, see what the FDA, the literature, and the patent office already know.

One search runs across regulatory filings, the published literature, and the patent landscape. Find your predicate devices, gauge market saturation, surface safety signals, study the real research, and check patent positioning. Generate professional PDF and Excel reports to share with consultants, advisors, and investors.

The discriminating term — used to query FDA and USPTO registries. Be specific: 'periodontal probe', not 'dental tool'.
What clinical or workflow problem does it solve, and for whom? Helps the report size the market and frame the opportunity.
What's new about this version? If substantive, the report shifts into Engineering Godmode: required specs, off-the-shelf component recommendations, BOM, ISO citations, and 510(k) timeline.
Only Device Type is required. Benefits and Novel improve report depth.
Try
Private session· we store nothing about your searches

Data sourced from openFDA (510(k) clearances, classification, MAUDE adverse events, recalls), PubMed (peer-reviewed literature), ClinicalTrials.gov (registered studies), and the USPTO Open Data Portal (patent records). All sources are public and current. Generated reports are produced by Anthropic Claude via the Skills API.

This tool surfaces signals from public databases. It is not regulatory, legal, or financial advice. FDA pathway recommendations are heuristic interpretations of public data and should be confirmed with a qualified regulatory consultant before submission planning. Patent matches are heuristic; a registered patent attorney is required for any freedom-to-operate analysis. The absence of adverse events or recalls does not mean a device category is safe — it may simply mean it is new or underreported.